Citus

8 engineers on Hacker News describe using Citus first-hand: 2 endorse it, 2 regret it, 1 are mixed.

50%trust
8first-hand users
7in production
endorse 2mixed 1regret 2uses, no opinion

“Glad to see the open sourcing - especially the backups (which is why we switched).”

regret · production · 3 yr · eric4smith · 2022-06-17 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“we run database of 100TB+ with trillions of rows with absolutely no problems.”

endorse · production · doh · 2019-11-03 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“When I tried Citus, their documentation has everything except what I needed to do to get their product to work.”

regret · personal · lykr0n · 2018-12-02 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“Citus has its own quirks and it's not perfect, so definitely do your research before you decide to use it.”

mixed · production · doh · 2017-10-05 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“those came off the shelf from some great partners (shout outs to CitusData and mLabs)”

endorse · production · jhwjhw · 2017-08-09 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“we use Citus so would be curious to hear”

neutral · production · qeternity · 2019-12-22 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“We use software called Citus which sits on top of Postgres and handles all of the read time sharding logic for us.”

neutral · production · malisper · 2016-11-30 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“each customer has access to analytics about their site which are stored in a CitusDB database”

neutral · production · jgrahamc · 2016-09-09 · source ↗ · wrong label?