InfluxDB

14 engineers on Hacker News describe using InfluxDB first-hand: 2 endorse it, 5 regret it, 3 are mixed.

38%trust
14first-hand users
12in production
endorse 2mixed 3regret 5uses, no opinion

“I was just not confident sticking with influxDB. Thankfully another OSS project really surprised me in terms of performance and reliability, which is questdb.”

regret · production · gabemocan · 2023-07-10 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“I used Influx Enterprise at a previous startup. Support was so bad after our first year we switched back to the OSS Influx”

regret · production · 1 yr · cfeduke · 2023-07-10 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“InfluxDB is very difficult to work with large datasets and enterprise/region compliance.”

regret · production · ecoqba11 · 2020-07-21 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“We killed our influx cluster numerous times with high cardinality metrics.”

regret · production · sa46 · 2020-05-30 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“But, soon we wanted to group, filter, sort by various dimensions and it lead to performance issues.”

regret · production · geekybiz · 2019-01-24 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“We switched to Influx from Graphite but some queries where unable or cumbersome to translate into Influx query language”

mixed · production · aequitas · 2017-11-08 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“Influx was at pre-1.0 and definitely had a tendency to "fall apart" under stress... Bit of a gamble but it turned out well!”

mixed · production · invertedohm · 2016-12-25 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“I've been running InfluxDB at scale for over a year in production and it's been a joy to use.”

endorse · production · 1 yr · invertedohm · 2016-12-23 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“We use it with influx, works great, though I find influx's syntax to be funky.”

mixed · production · beachy · 2016-11-29 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“I've been using Influx for about a year know and I'm really happy with it already.”

endorse · personal · 1 yr · q_no · 2014-12-08 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“I thought you might like that we moved to InfluxDB but: no.”

neutral · production · mikemcquaid · 2023-08-09 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“From our testing we are considerably faster to ingest data than Influx.”

neutral · personal · bluestreak · 2019-11-30 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“As Influx is a fine product, but they acknowledged our particular use-case was not a good fit”

neutral · production · LogicX · 2018-08-09 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“scrubbing and feeding data into influxdb”

neutral · production · Ixiaus · 2014-12-27 · source ↗ · wrong label?