9 engineers on Hacker News describe using LuaJIT first-hand: 4 endorse it, 0 regret it, 0 are mixed.
“We did, however, sponsor some of Mike Pall's work on LuaJIT based on our particular workload”
endorse · production · cloudflare · 2013-11-29 · source ↗ · wrong label?“I don't need to have nests of callbacks to get non-blocking logic since Lua supports true closures. The code is positively readable”
endorse · production · SomeCallMeTim · 2013-10-07 · source ↗ · wrong label?“Brew also has Luajit, which I use 99% of the time; it's the environment I run in production because it's so much faster.”
endorse · production · ajacksified · 2012-10-30 · source ↗ · wrong label?“the code is SO straightforward using this stack -- and what I'm using it for is so simple”
endorse · production · SomeCallMeTim · 2011-09-29 · source ↗ · wrong label?“Binary translated libriscv vs LuaJIT”
neutral · personal · fwsgonzo · 2024-01-15 · source ↗ · wrong label?“we were the first usage of LuaJIT in the Source Engine”
neutral · personal · andrewmcwatters · 2023-02-02 · source ↗ · wrong label?“I actually measured it. It was around 65-85ns for Lua and 55ns for LuaJIT”
neutral · personal · fwsgonzo · 2022-11-23 · source ↗ · wrong label?“We run a WAF based on LuaJIT in resty.”
neutral · production · minxomat · 2019-07-12 · source ↗ · wrong label?“also so far we've supported both luajit and puc lua (and intend to drop puc lua because of ffi and a few other niggles)”
neutral · production · rasterman · 2016-09-28 · source ↗ · wrong label?