6 engineers on Hacker News describe using Om first-hand: 0 endorse it, 3 regret it, 0 are mixed.
“after maintaining a fork for a few months we switched to TypeScript. Burned once; not again.”
regret · production · kccqzy · 2019-12-12 · source ↗ · wrong label?“The cursor system in its first iteration was just too cumbersome (for exactly the reasons this author states).”
regret · production · 0.25 yr · pkcsecurity · 2016-01-21 · source ↗ · wrong label?“there's always some aspect of its behaviour that it turns out I didn't understand... it conceptually doesn't sit well with my brain.”
regret · production · okal · 2015-06-29 · source ↗ · wrong label?“If you look at how Om evolved though, it started out with that simple model”
neutral · production · lsdafjklsd · 2015-08-03 · source ↗ · wrong label?“We use clojurescript extensively in the UI, and have been moving large parts of it to Om.”
neutral · production · lemming · 2014-11-04 · source ↗ · wrong label?“have been moving large parts of it to Om.”
neutral · production · cbrozefsky · 2014-11-04 · source ↗ · wrong label?