Parallels Desktop

8 engineers on Hacker News describe using Parallels Desktop first-hand: 4 endorse it, 2 regret it, 1 are mixed.

61%trust
8first-hand users
4in production
endorse 4mixed 1regret 2uses, no opinion

“when we switched to apple silicon, it stopped working (you could install a MacOS virtual machine, but it was based on an apple dev image”

regret · production · ttcbj · 2023-08-31 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“We were using UTM but have recently switched to Parallels, which is nice.”

endorse · production · aidos · 2022-06-10 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“use Parallels as it has better Windows 11 ARM64 support.”

endorse · production · 1 yr · zamadatix · 2021-12-15 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“It also doesn't do bridging networks - only NAT and host networking. ... I just need to fire an ocasional Linux vem to test something it is more than enough to me.”

mixed · personal · ulzeraj · 2018-12-20 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“I've been using Parallels Desktop to develop & test Windows software from a Mac for the last decade. It's excellent”

endorse · personal · 10 yr · SyneRyder · 2018-12-20 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“Performance using Parallels was poopy, and Windows machines are way cheaper than human time.”

regret · production · philiphodgen · 2012-04-01 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“The superbly integrated Parallels is the only non-bundled software on OSX that I would really hate to live without.”

endorse · personal · chalst · 2011-12-21 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“I've been using Parallels for Mac (last year's version).”

neutral · personal · figital · 2011-12-15 · source ↗ · wrong label?