9 engineers on Hacker News describe using Phusion Passenger first-hand: 3 endorse it, 0 regret it, 1 are mixed.
“We've been using Passenger at RailsMachine.com since they released it, and have always been impressed with the team and the performance of the product”
endorse · production · MattRogish · 2014-11-25 · source ↗ · wrong label?“We use the Phusion passenger Ruby image, which bundles almost every dependency we needed along with a useful init system”
endorse · production · zrail · 2014-10-17 · source ↗ · wrong label?“I never ran Phusion in production for long because of the issue with blocking when spawning, and now I see it's been fixed”
mixed · production · EvilTrout · 2010-09-15 · source ↗ · wrong label?“I've also had great success at Passenger with apache.”
endorse · production · anotherjesse · 2010-03-31 · source ↗ · wrong label?“Round 1 used Passenger, but the feedback we got was that Unicorn performed better so we switched to that.”
neutral · personal · krg · 2013-05-17 · source ↗ · wrong label?“Its a Fedora instance running passenger, nginx, and rails.”
neutral · personal · nckbz · 2011-10-23 · source ↗ · wrong label?“we run a very straight forward Rails hosting stack (Apache/Passenger/MySQL)”
neutral · production · bradleyland · 2011-06-22 · source ↗ · wrong label?“I don't even think I've bounced any services like apache or passenger on that box in over a year.”
neutral · production · rapind · 2011-06-15 · source ↗ · wrong label?“On the ruby-passenger service we follow the nginx pulled by passenger”
neutral · production · spahl · 2010-12-23 · source ↗ · wrong label?