Ruby Enterprise Edition

5 engineers on Hacker News describe using Ruby Enterprise Edition first-hand: 1 endorse it, 0 regret it, 0 are mixed.

67%trust
5first-hand users
5in production
endorse 1mixed 0regret 0uses, no opinion

“REE and Rails 2.3 were far lighter weight and faster than Ruby 1.9 and Rails 3.2.”

endorse · production · nirvdrum · 2013-06-04 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“Earlier this year our REE -> 1.9.3 upgrade took about a month and a half.”

neutral · production · johnbellone · 2013-06-25 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“Startup time for our app is much, much worse than it was under ree”

neutral · production · justinweiss · 2011-12-22 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“Load time on code seems to be an order of magnitude slower... so I'm back to REE.”

neutral · production · rbranson · 2011-09-25 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“1.9.2 doesn't have any GC tuning options, so it proved slower than REE in production for us.”

neutral · production · dhh · 2011-09-06 · source ↗ · wrong label?