sbt

11 engineers on Hacker News describe using sbt first-hand: 2 endorse it, 7 regret it, 1 are mixed.

29%trust
11first-hand users
8in production
endorse 2mixed 1regret 7uses, no opinion

“I don't really mind sbt, but ... maybe the fact that sbt builds can look so different is an issue.”

mixed · production · aeroevan · 2025-02-07 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“The last time I tried Scala it was horrendous. SBT? Seriously? Binary incompatibility between minor versions?”

regret · personal · StreamBright · 2021-12-11 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“we were able to make the relevant integration and fault tests scale from local runs via SBT to full geo-distributed clusters”

endorse · production · freels · 2018-07-13 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“6) No SBT”

regret · production · brianwawok · 2017-02-23 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“SBT cannot run with 512 ram, so you cannot compile locally.”

regret · production · brianwawok · 2016-02-17 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“SBT is super slow compared to maven”

regret · production · 1 yr · Sphax · 2014-12-03 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“getting SBT and Play Java to work correctly in IDEA was enough of a pain”

regret · personal · matrix · 2013-12-18 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“all the opportunity costs represented in sbt (which is finally passable but no better)”

regret · production · kasey_junk · 2013-12-03 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“I -love- SBT and I detest the XML-hell at the heart of Maven projects.”

endorse · production · brightsize · 2012-08-14 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“I did not care for sbt at all.”

regret · personal · robfig · 2011-11-16 · source ↗ · wrong label?

“for our production systems building in SBT, a typical test run is significantly less than 10 seconds”

neutral · production · NickPollard · 2013-12-02 · source ↗ · wrong label?