8 engineers on Hacker News describe using SUSE Linux Enterprise Server first-hand: 1 endorse it, 4 regret it, 0 are mixed.
“SLES/openSUSE never managed to get the same support from third parties and communities as CentOS/Fedora.”
regret · production · aeyes · 2023-06-22 · source ↗ · wrong label?“I've run them all in production... I prefer SLE but to each their own.”
endorse · production · arminiusreturns · 2020-12-08 · source ↗ · wrong label?“KDE4 on FreeBSD has been far more stable for me than SLES(though in SLES's partial defense, it's packages are quite far behind).”
regret · production · GalacticDomin8r · 2013-07-19 · source ↗ · wrong label?“We use SLES at work, needless to say this has to be the most annoying product to setup ever.”
regret · production · mitchty · 2012-12-23 · source ↗ · wrong label?“SLES is not like most linuxes in terms of package support. And the production datacenter does not even let us use full list of SLES packages”
regret · production · tingletech · 2011-09-15 · source ↗ · wrong label?“TokuDB but SuSE (13.2) didn't ship a module for it then. I have to check again in 42.3.”
neutral · production · petre · 2018-04-20 · source ↗ · wrong label?“If we ship code that runs on SuSE 234 and RHEL 345, that's what we test on.”
neutral · production · concede_pluto · 2017-07-13 · source ↗ · wrong label?“In SUSE dev and stage started as clones and production is very close to dev/stage but built by a different group”
neutral · production · tingletech · 2011-09-16 · source ↗ · wrong label?